FLOW
Forward Deployed Engineer · Product Demo
Flow Engineering
FLOW
The challenge
Integration
risk lives in
the gap
between teams.
risk lives in
the gap
between teams.
01 / Siloed requirements
Battery and software teams work in parallel, reconcile in series
Each domain maintains its own requirement set. Reconciliation is manual, asynchronous, and nobody owns the seam.
02 / Late visibility
Integration conflicts surface at CDR, not PDR
Cross-domain mismatches live undetected until a formal review forces the comparison. By then, rework is measured in weeks.
03 / Change blindness
Every requirement change becomes a multi-team coordination event
No automated downstream visibility. A thermal requirement change kicks off Slack threads, not a system update.
FLOW
What we'll cover today
Three capabilities.
Three program outcomes.
Three program outcomes.
01 / Structure
Program architecture
→ Program outcome
Requirements connect to design elements and verification artifacts in one model, not three spreadsheets. SEs have full program visibility from day one.
02 / Adoption
Domain engineer fit
→ Program outcome
ME, EE, and SW engineers work in Flow without it feeling like admin. Their models and scripts are already the record of truth. Traceability is a byproduct.
03 / Impact
Change analysis
→ Program outcome
Change a requirement and see every affected artifact flagged immediately. Integration risk surfaces in hours, not at CDR. SEs catch cross-domain conflicts before anyone books a rework meeting.